|
July 14, 2010, 01:27 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 27,469
|
|
Fifa 2010 World Cup standings
Fifa 2010 World Cup standings: (OFFICIALLY DONE BY FIFA)
1 Spain, 2 Netherlands, 3 Germany, 4 Uruguay, 5 Argentina, 6 Brazil, 7 Ghana, 8 Paraguay
9 Japan, 10 Chile, 11 Portugal, 12 United States, 13 England, 14 Mexico, 15 South Korea, 16 Slovakia
17 Ivory Coast, 18 Slovenia, 19 Switzerland, 20 South Africa, 21 Australia, 22 New Zealand, 23 Serbia, 24 Denmark, 25 Greece, 26 Italy, 27 Nigeria, 28 Algeria, 29 France, 30 Honduras, 31 Cameroon, 32 North Korea
Last edited by al-Sagar; July 14, 2010 at 09:27 PM..
|
July 14, 2010, 02:36 PM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
28 Algeria, 29 France
|
It's amazing how, when you mix the two, you get to the finals. Then again, not always.
__________________
Screw the IPL, I'm going to the MLC!
|
July 14, 2010, 03:00 PM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: March 7, 2007
Location: elsewhere
Favorite Player: ZAR
Posts: 9,896
|
|
what a WC Sirji
__________________
﴾اَلَاۤ اِنَّ اَوۡلِيَآءَ اللّٰهِ لَا خَوۡفٌ عَلَيۡهِمۡ وَلَا هُمۡ يَحۡزَنُوۡنَ ۖ ۚ ﴿۶۲
"Listen, the friends of Allah shall have no fear, nor shall they grieve" (Yunus: 62)
|
July 14, 2010, 03:09 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: June 17, 2007
Location: UK
Favorite Player: Sakib,KP,Steyn
Posts: 4,073
|
|
Now Newzealand cant claim they had better world cup than Australia. Thats not fair.
|
July 14, 2010, 08:31 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: March 3, 2009
Location: Bangladesh in Jupiter
Favorite Player: Mash, Alok, Ash, Sakib
Posts: 3,515
|
|
Nice work Offstump. But I am wondering how you judged it. I get from 1-4 but for the rest of the teams is it by their group performance, ie points acquired in the group stage? Or is it by the number of goals scored and conceeded throughout the whole thing? Or is it just by performance from your own point of view?
|
July 14, 2010, 09:00 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 27,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashraf-FTP
Nice work Offstump. But I am wondering how you judged it. I get from 1-4 but for the rest of the teams is it by their group performance, ie points acquired in the group stage? Or is it by the number of goals scored and conceeded throughout the whole thing? Or is it just by performance from your own point of view?
|
its done by fifa .... i am giving the link soon
cant find the exact fifa link. this one is from BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/foot...10/8814195.stm
Last edited by al-Sagar; July 14, 2010 at 09:28 PM..
|
July 14, 2010, 10:07 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: March 3, 2009
Location: Bangladesh in Jupiter
Favorite Player: Mash, Alok, Ash, Sakib
Posts: 3,515
|
|
Ohh thanks. Because my opinion is different [I based it on how the teams performed in every match, just generally].
|
July 16, 2010, 03:51 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 2, 2010
Posts: 2,107
|
|
great!
|
July 17, 2010, 12:55 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Dale Willem Steyn
Posts: 2,481
|
|
Thanks OS.
__________________
Cricket is the Passion
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.
|
|