facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5, 2002, 04:27 AM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545
Default Lowest ODI totals

38 (15.4 overs) Zimbabwe v Sri Lanka Colombo (SSC) 2001/02
43 (19.5 overs) Pakistan v West Indies Cape Town 1992/93
45 (40.3 overs) Canada v England Manchester 1979
54 (26.3 overs) India v Sri Lanka Sharjah 2000/01
55 (28.3 overs) Sri Lanka v West Indies Sharjah 1986/87
63 (25.5 overs) India v Australia Sydney 1980/81
64 (35.5 overs) New Zealand v Pakistan Sharjah 1985/86
68 (31.3 overs) Scotland v West Indies Leicester 1999
69 (28 overs) South Africa v Australia Sydney 1993/94
70 (25.2 overs) Australia v England Birmingham 1977
70 (26.3 overs) Australia v New Zealand Adelaide 1985/86
71 (23.4 overs) Pakistan v West Indies Brisbane 1992/93
74 (29 overs) New Zealand v Australia Wellington 1981/82
74 (40.2 overs) Pakistan v England Adelaide 1991/92


THIS IS WHERE BD IS POSITIONED NOW

78 (24.1 overs) India v Sri Lanka Kanpur 1986/87
78* (16.5 overs) Sri Lanka v Pakistan Sharjah 2001/02
79 (34.2 overs) India v Pakistan Sialkot 1978/79
81 (48 overs) Pakistan v West Indies Sydney 1992/93
85 (47 overs) Pakistan v England Manchester 1978
86 (32.4 overs) England v Australia Manchester 2001
86 (37.2 overs) Sri Lanka v West Indies Manchester 1975
87* (34.2 overs) Bangladesh v Pakistan Dhaka 1999/00
87 (32.5 overs) Pakistan v India Sharjah 1984/85
87 (29.3 overs) West Indies v Australia Sydney 1992/93
89 (37.2 overs) England v New Zealand Wellington (WTS) 2001/02
90 (37.1 overs) Kenya v India Bloemfontein 2001/02
91 (35.4 overs) Australia v West Indies Perth 1986/87
91 (35.5 overs) Sri Lanka v Australia Adelaide 1984/85
91 (31.5 overs) West Indies v Zimbabwe Sydney 2000/01
92 (32.3 overs) Bangladesh v Zimbabwe Nairobi (AK) 1997/98
93 (36.2 overs) England v Australia Leeds 1975
93 (35.2 overs) West Indies v Kenya Poona 1995/96
94 (35.3 overs) Bangladesh v Pakistan Moratuwa 1985/86
94 (52.3 overs) East Africa v England Birmingham 1975
94 (31.7 overs) England v Australia Melbourne 1978/79
94 (25.2 overs) New Zealand v Australia Christchurch 1989/90
94 (31.4 overs) Zimbabwe v Pakistan Sharjah 1996/97
96 (41 overs) Sri Lanka v India Sharjah 1983/84
98 (34 overs) Sri Lanka v South Africa Colombo (RPS) 1993/94
98 (39 overs) Sri Lanka v India Sharjah 1998/99
99 (33.3 overs) Sri Lanka v England Perth 1998/99
99* (36.3 overs) Zimbabwe v West Indies Hyderabad (Decc) 1993/94

Source: http://www-bd.cricket.org/link_to_da...AM_TOTALS.html
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old August 5, 2002, 04:31 AM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545
Default Our Batsman has got past these Zim batsman

ODI # 1776
LG Abans Triangular Series, 2001-02, 1st Match
Sri Lanka v Zimbabwe
Sinhalese Sports Club Ground, Colombo
8 December 2001 (50-over match)

Result: Sri Lanka won by 9 wickets
Points: Sri Lanka 5, Zimbabwe 0

Toss: Sri Lanka
Umpires: DN Pathirana and MG Silva
TV Umpire: EAR de Silva
Match Referee: R Subba Row (Eng)
Man of the Match: WPUJC Vaas


Zimbabwe innings (50 overs maximum) R M B 4 6
DD Ebrahim lbw b Vaas 0 1 1 0 0
GW Flower b Vaas 1 24 11 0 0
*SV Carlisle c Perera b Vaas 16 50 35 3 0
+A Flower c Sangakkara b Vaas 0 2 2 0 0
CB Wishart lbw b Vaas 6 28 17 1 0
DA Marillier not out 4 35 10 0 0
T Taibu lbw b Vaas 0 2 1 0 0
HH Streak lbw b Vaas 0 8 3 0 0
ML Nkala c Sangakkara b Vaas 1 11 11 0 0
TJ Friend b Muralitharan 4 5 5 1 0
HK Olonga c Jayawardene b Muralitharan 0 2 2 0 0
Extras (lb 1, w 1, nb 4) 6
Total (all out, 15.4 overs, 87 mins) 38

FoW: 1-0 (Ebrahim, 0.1 ov), 2-11 (GW Flower, 4.3 ov),
3-11 (A Flower, 4.5 ov), 4-27 (Carlisle, 10.3 ov),
5-27 (Wishart, 10.4 ov), 6-27 (Taibu, 10.5 ov),
7-29 (Streak, 12.4 ov), 8-32 (Nkala, 14.3 ov),
9-38 (Friend, 15.2 ov), 10-38 (Olonga, 15.4 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Vaas 8 3 19 8 (4nb)
Zoysa 7 2 17 0 (1w)
Muralitharan 0.4 0 1 2

Sri Lanka innings (target: 39 runs from 50 overs) R M B 4 6
*ST Jayasuriya not out 13 21 7 2 0
DA Gunawardene lbw b Streak 2 3 3 0 0
MS Atapattu not out 23 17 16 4 0
Extras (w 2) 2
Total (1 wicket, 4.2 overs, 21 mins) 40

DNB: DPMD Jayawardene, RP Arnold, +KC Sangakkara, DNT Zoysa,
ASA Perera, HDPK Dharmasena, M Muralitharan, WPUJC Vaas.

FoW: 1-4 (Gunawardene, 0.5 ov).

Bowling O M R W
Streak 2.2 0 26 1 (2w)
Friend 2 0 14 0


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12th man UDU Chandana (SL), TR Gripper (ZIM)
Zimbabwe innings
Chaminda Vaas takes a hat trick with the wickets of Carlisle, Wishart and Taibu
Chaminda Vaas sets a new world record of 8/19 and takes 8 wickets for the first time in any One Day International
Muralitharan was the previous holder of the world record with 7/30
One Day Internationals Lowest Team Scores 38 runs
Sri Lanka innings
Fastest One Day Internationals Victory
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 5, 2002, 10:23 AM
Mahmood's Avatar
Mahmood Mahmood is offline
Administrator
Operations & Administrations
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,825

So we are suppossed to feel good now?

The problem is, other teams scored low one day, another day scored 300 in ODI.

For us? We suck. Yesterday, we sucked harder.

Sucks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 5, 2002, 09:03 PM
Zobair's Avatar
Zobair Zobair is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: July 15, 2002
Location: 16th floor
Posts: 4,106
Default suck....

suck! suck! sucking!suckers!suckation!suckly!sucklish!bd cricteam!suckers!sucking....
don't mind me.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 5, 2002, 11:40 PM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545
Default Just trying hard

Just trying hard to find some Shantona. That's all.

In order to do that, I have summed up the above stats and found out the following (and as we still haven't played South Africa yet, and we've got 3 ODIs plus 2 tests to play against South Africa in South Africa - just our next tour, so I am trying to find out how many of these are left for us coming in the near future)

SriLanka currently holds the record for being the highest number of times scoring under 100 runs (8 - eight times) - according to this Cricinfo site).

Pakistan is second (6 times).

And then us (4) times and we are equalling New Zealand, West Indies and England (maybe).

So, we are currently half-way there to beating or equalling the current record holders, unless something miraculous or impossible happens soon because if it doesn't, we all know our weaknesses against pace attack, and the number of matches that we have played so far - only 52.

If we go at the rate that we are currently going, it will be sooner rather than later that we would be the record holders for this particular aspect.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 5, 2002, 11:56 PM
Ockey Ockey is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Posts: 241
Default pissed off!

I cannot express anything but frustration and anger. How could they....score anything less than 100? What really pissed me off was how Khaled Masud, Pilot got himself out. No doubt he is the most persevering player in the team and deserves to lead the team as captain but was very disappoint and....upset over the way he batted. It was uncharacteristic of him. He shouldn't have let the failures of his team mates get him down and lose focus.

I was following the commentry. He and Maju were the last wickets standing. He went for a lofty shot off the bowling of Chandana and was caught by Murali. He would have never played that shot had the situation been not so hopeless. He should have kept his head down and played till Maju got out or the innings ended.

I think the reason I am so disappointed with Pilot is because of the idiocy of the so called "specialist" batsmen and the "all-rounders". Pilot's temperment is the only thing that would have made any sense in the utter chaos.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 6, 2002, 02:11 AM
Tehsin Tehsin is offline
Administrator
BanglaCricket Founder
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Favorite Player: তামীম, শাï¿
Posts: 9,472
Default One match to go

If Pilot can instill his personality and guts into the rest of the team, the team can do much much better.
After the 226, the 76 was a shock. Kudos to Pilot, even though he did make that one rash decision.
Our batting was weak due to the presense of too many "all rounders" (I guess their guts/belly were rounder than their performance - I have to amuse myself somehow, naki na ?) and not enough specialized batsmen.
Good job by Monju and nice try by the bowlers even though they got whacked. They had 76 runs to defend and they downed three wickets. I was expecting a 10 wicket loss within 10 overs.
Kapali needs to play a bit more before the coach can make a call on his potential. Mohsin was quiet taken by Kapali and tried him at number four. Unfortunately, Kapali is still fresh to international cricket and maybe later on, he might work it. Let's drop him three places for now and let him get used to real cricket. Besides, jekhane 'specialized batsmen' ra parchena, okhane o ki korbe ?
Durjoy and Shujon. Hothath kore oderke oder barir uthan theke teney ene SL'r shamne thele diley ora r er beshi ki korte parbe ? mnitei becharara amader desher man-e shadharan, international e namale to patta na pawai shabhabik. Shujon tao bowling e aasha jagai. Durjoy er kichui nei. O k A team e khelao, he does have the ability to get some QUICK runs in od matches just like Shujon. But, oder theke beshi responsibility amra emniteo aasha korina.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 6, 2002, 09:47 AM
Mahmood's Avatar
Mahmood Mahmood is offline
Administrator
Operations & Administrations
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Favorite Player: Mashrafe Mortaza
Posts: 7,825

I think BD have to enforce a one ball a over rule.

The rule: now on BD players will pick a random number on each over between 1 and 6. Then, on that over, they are only allowed to hit that ball, other 5, simply defend.

The good side: You will easily make around 100+ with 2/3 wickets lost. That will teach us how to defend, self control of not to chase every ball. This will dramitically improve test temperment resulting in a draw in 12 months.

The bad side: we will inforce this policy for 2 yrs. So those 2 years, we wont have any 200+ scores.

I think this will help us a whole lot, right now, they go for bad balls and get out. The random number will not matter on what ball it is, and the opposition bowler wont have any clue when he attacks.

Shall we?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket