Online Game: (FTP: From the Pavillion) - Page 87

nzfan · #**2151** January 8, 2009, 07:44 PM

Whats the point of these computer opponents, I scored 487-3

Rommel · #**2152** January 8, 2009, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
Whats the point of these computer opponents, I scored 487-3

Damn. 487? Thats crazy.

Akib · #**2153** January 8, 2009, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
Whats the point of these computer opponents, I scored 487-3

To inspire confidence?

nzfan · #**2154** January 8, 2009, 08:02 PM

In reply they are 7-7

Rommel · #**2155** January 8, 2009, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
In reply they are 7-7

nzfan · #**2156** January 8, 2009, 08:08 PM

http://www.fromthepavilion.org/comme...?gameId=244085

Rifat · #**2157** January 8, 2009, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
Whats the point of these computer opponents, I scored 487-3

to set a standard for victory=> translation: if you can't beat a computer, you really suck at this game

for those unfortunate players who consistently lose but has been following/building up a good team chemistry accounting for talent/ability...it is to make them feel better.

it is possible to lose to a computer! get a team combination of worst players!

another reason: is to bring about a "Balance" so every league has at least 2 computer players so that league doesn't become so competetive that you feel like you do everything right and still lose!

Akib · #**2158** January 8, 2009, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
http://www.fromthepavilion.org/comme...?gameId=244085

Thats called record breaking.

nzfan · #**2159** January 8, 2009, 08:15 PM

All over scored 487-3

sealy 127-87 balls
brohaska 172-113 balls
rupasinghe 76-53 balls
von crapp- 77-4 balls

bowled them out for 19

Hodge- 6 wickets for 10 runs
Heath 2 wickets for 5 runs
humayun 1 wicket for 2 runs

won by 467 runs

tonoy · #**2160** January 8, 2009, 09:41 PM

My god nadim, you produce one of the worst pitches. My batsman can't score at all.

Rommel · #**2161** January 8, 2009, 09:41 PM

My batting is doing well again. I am in a One Day league match vs. Cyberbangla and I am currently at 92/0 after 13 overs. Nawab is on 38* and Foster is on 52*.

Akib · #**2162** January 8, 2009, 09:44 PM

My bats picking it up after a slow start, however I'm pissed off because I forgot to set my orders properly.... (put batting to normal on a FLAT track...)

77-1 in 14 overs.

BTW, Rommel did u see the match ratings for our match. 7000 more than you yet I still lost by 79 runs...

Rommel's XI v Tiger Cubs >> Match Ratings

Match Ratings
	Rommel's XI	Tiger Cubs
Batting - Top Order:	5,355	5,729
Batting - Middle Order:	3,788	4,038
Batting - Tail:	2,518	3,033
Bowling - Seam:	4,745 (2)	6,026 (4)
Bowling - Spin:	5,188 (8)	4,604 (6)
Fielding/Keeping:	4,570	5,413
Overall:	83,333	90,270

sbsash · #**2163** January 8, 2009, 09:48 PM

i lost today's match.

Rommel · #**2164** January 8, 2009, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akib
My bats picking it up after a slow start, however I'm pissed off because I forgot to set my orders properly.... (put batting to normal on a FLAT track...)

77-1 in 14 overs.

BTW, Rommel did u see the match ratings for our match. 7000 more than you yet I still lost by 79 runs...

Rommel's XI v Tiger Cubs >> Match Ratings

Match Ratings
	Rommel's XI	Tiger Cubs
Batting - Top Order:	5,355	5,729
Batting - Middle Order:	3,788	4,038
Batting - Tail:	2,518	3,033
Bowling - Seam:	4,745 (2)	6,026 (4)
Bowling - Spin:	5,188 (8)	4,604 (6)
Fielding/Keeping:	4,570	5,413
Overall:	83,333	90,270

Ya I never understood that.

Rifat · #**2165** January 8, 2009, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ro1249
Ya I never understood that.

in the game rules it is stated that sometimes, a lower ranked team will beat a higher ranked one. there is a factor called "Luck" which is part of the match engine not factored towards Ratings...

look, a team which may be better than you has a *higher chance* of victory...it is all computerized into some random probablility formula...*chance of a yorker triggering* chance of this..that! i hope you get the gist.

i think they did a pretty good job at making the game as realistic as possible. but i am hoping for a better game in which the user himself can bat bowl or field that woiuld be sick

too bad, those games are called Brian Lara/Ricky Ponting Cricket international game only available in PlayStation etc... and if someone produces those types of games for free...then the original PlayStation producers will lose money.

Akib · #**2166** January 8, 2009, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rifat
in the game rules it is stated that sometimes, a lower ranked team will beat a higher ranked one. there is a factor called "Luck" which is part of the match engine not factored towards Ratings...

look, a team which may be better than you has a *higher chance* of victory...it is all computerized into some random probablility formula...*chance of a yorker triggering* chance of this..that! i hope you get the gist.

i think they did a pretty good job at making the game as realistic as possible. but i am hoping for a better game in which the user himself can bat bowl or field that woiuld be sick

too bad, those games are called Brian Lara/Ricky Ponting Cricket international game only available in PlayStation etc... and if someone produces those types of games for free...then the original PlayStation producers will lose money.

I dunno why, but I actually like managing better than playing. Like I played cricket 07, but I liked the international cricket captain series much better, probably cause Im a stats buff, but who knows....I like this tolo, although I must say, being broke all the time is annoying.

sbsash · #**2167** January 8, 2009, 10:16 PM

just made a deal with a guy in my friendly league that I will use a super weak squad against him and he will bid for a player I'm selling (the amount I'm selling him for is expensive for his skills).I'm going to lose the friendly league anyway,so getting more finacial option is better than just winning a game but losing the league.

Akib · #**2168** January 8, 2009, 11:42 PM

Well my team recovered to score 370/5.

Lukemon:179 from 144 balls
Nitschke: 88 from 54 balls not out.

tonoy · #**2169** January 8, 2009, 11:49 PM

well i managed to make 312 on a crumbling pitch.

nzfan · #**2170** January 9, 2009, 12:20 AM

Just checked the game, Nadims in serious trouble at 38-5 chasing over 300

Nadim · #**2171** January 9, 2009, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
Just checked the game, Nadims in serious trouble at 38-5 chasing over 300

yes im bro! what the hell is rong with this team now! when my team win, all the player r in top form but if i loose 1 match badly next match definte i loose badly again(like today because i lost by huge margin yesterday).

tonoy · #**2172** January 9, 2009, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
yes im bro! what the hell is rong with this team now! when my team win, all the player r in top form but if i loose 1 match badly next match definte i loose badly again(like today because i lost by huge margin yesterday).

Don't be too hard on yourself Nadim. It's just my team is too good for you.

nzfan · #**2173** January 9, 2009, 12:27 AM

Your players form at the moment is worse than Tonoys, that could be why

tonoy · #**2174** January 9, 2009, 12:29 AM

By the way nzfan, I am still waiting for that rematch.

Nadim · #**2175** January 9, 2009, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzfan
Your players form at the moment is worse than Tonoys, that could be why

but im sure they will come back strongly in the next match........