facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old January 23, 2017, 03:29 AM
Roy_1 Roy_1 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 21, 2017
Location: India
Favorite Player: Kohli
Posts: 2,783

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here
How is Pant's wicket keeping ? I keep hearing about how great a batsman he is, no one talks about the most important stuff, his keeping.

forget his batting, with his keeping alone dhoni got us wkts out of nowhere, almost one every match. we have enough batters, but the replacement keeper has to be as good.
Insane batsman, average keeper, he is only 19, should be given a test cap, Dhoni also did not exactly set the stage on fire when he was 19, international exposure often does wonder to a blooming sportsman
Reply With Quote

  #52  
Old January 23, 2017, 05:13 AM
Only1raz Only1raz is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Posts: 131

1. Tamim Iqbal
2. Imrul Kayes
3. Mominul Haque
4. Mushfiqur Rahim
5. Mosaddek Hossain
6. Shakib Al Hasan
7. Shabbir Rahman
8. Mehedi Hasan Miraz
9. Mohammad Shahid/Taijul Islam
10. Taskin Ahmed
11. Mustafizur Rahman


No Mahmudullah Riyad. Don't want this guy anywhere near the Test team
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old January 23, 2017, 05:22 AM
Only1raz Only1raz is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Posts: 131

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gowza
I really think Abu hider and Mohammad saifuddin should be in consideration. I don't have any problem with the other fast bowlers named but is babu really a better prospect than hider as a bowler? And is he really better than saifuddin as an all rounder?

As far as shahid is he still injured? Because it looks like a lot of other pacers have really jumped over him in the queue.
I think Abu Jayed should have been selected
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old January 23, 2017, 07:16 AM
Nafi's Avatar
Nafi Nafi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 23, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mahmudullah Riyad
Posts: 6,190

Mahmudullah dropped everywhere. I still have faith. And i dont think indian super trundlers, yadav and shami will be threatening to him on an indian pitch. Dropping kayes because his test performance is just not good enough.


1. Tamim
2. Sarkar
3. Mominul
4. Mushfiqur
5. Mahmudullah
6. Shakib
7. Sabbir
8. Miraz
9. Rabbi/ taijul
10. Taskin Ahmed /rabbi
11. Mustafizur
__________________
BD_Shardul: ''I myself will not go through the troubles of dating. I will offer a prayer that will let me know if my would be bride is compatible with me through a dream''
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old January 23, 2017, 08:35 AM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

since 1st January 2014 mominul has averaged 51, shakib and imrul 49, tamim 42, imrul 41. In this same period riyad has averaged 29.2.

Out of that group he's the only one not to have scored a century in that period, the others have all scored at least 2.

He also has less 50s than all of them bar imrul who has 3 compared to Riyad's 6 and mushy who equals him on 6.

At some point you have to say enough is enough. If riyad is good enough he'll make his way back into the team but I think it's time to give someone else an opportunity.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old January 23, 2017, 08:38 AM
Tigers_eye's Avatar
Tigers_eye Tigers_eye is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 32,798

Answer me: (Are they going to change their approach? no.)

Two words.

"Labh ki?"
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old January 23, 2017, 08:42 AM
Tigers_eye's Avatar
Tigers_eye Tigers_eye is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 32,798

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gowza
since 1st January 2014 mominul has averaged 51, shakib and imrul 49, tamim 42, imrul 41. In this same period riyad has averaged 29.2.

Out of that group he's the only one not to have scored a century in that period, the others have all scored at least 2.

He also has less 50s than all of them bar imrul who has 3 compared to Riyad's 6 and mushy who equals him on 6.

At some point you have to say enough is enough. If riyad is good enough he'll make his way back into the team but I think it's time to give someone else an opportunity.
+ He was dropped from the test squad once.
+ He didn't change his ways of getting out and the timing of the out.
+ Fielding declined immensely.
+ He was moved around the lineup just to keep him in the team when he continuously failed at each position.
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old January 23, 2017, 11:14 AM
Neel Here's Avatar
Neel Here Neel Here is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Favorite Player: Aravinda DeSilva, Lara
Posts: 3,084

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gowza
since 1st January 2014 mominul has averaged 51, shakib and imrul 49, tamim 42, imrul 41. In this same period riyad has averaged 29.2.

Out of that group he's the only one not to have scored a century in that period, the others have all scored at least 2.

He also has less 50s than all of them bar imrul who has 3 compared to Riyad's 6 and mushy who equals him on 6.

At some point you have to say enough is enough. If riyad is good enough he'll make his way back into the team but I think it's time to give someone else an opportunity.
I keep hearing Riyad should be dropped but is there any alternative player who picks himself on performance alone ? any stand out ?
as they say class is permanent, form is not. this guy definitely has the ability.

@Nafi, the "super trundlers" average in the mid to high 140 k's and comfortably outbowled the vaunted english pace attack composed of broad, anderson et al on placid Indian pitches.
__________________
Anything can be sacrificed for truth,
nothing is too valuable to sacrifice truth instead.
-- Swami Vivekananda
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old January 23, 2017, 11:26 AM
Neel Here's Avatar
Neel Here Neel Here is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Favorite Player: Aravinda DeSilva, Lara
Posts: 3,084

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_1
Insane batsman, average keeper, he is only 19, should be given a test cap, Dhoni also did not exactly set the stage on fire when he was 19, international exposure often does wonder to a blooming sportsman
the caveat being, not everyone anyone can be dhoni. he was a once in a lifetime player. and mark my words, India would miss his keeping skills even more than it misses his batting skills, unless we get a good enough alternative.

I am OK with going for a so-so WK for LOI's but not for tests. dismissals mean hell of a lot more in tests than in LOI's. one missed chance can really hurt you. it can be the difference between winning a test and losing it.
I still remember parthiv preventing a match & series win against australia in sydney with his horrible keeping. more than a decade later his keeping is still awful, as we saw in the england series.

however good the batting may be, test WK position should not come at the expense of keeping abilities.

btw, did you watch today's irani trophy match ? absolute gun performance from wriddhiman saha in 4th innings after ROI were 63/4.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/irani-cu...h/1053705.html
he has done that time and again, he saved our skin in WI too ! he is also an above avg keeper. he deserves a place in the side for sometime.

right now pant should play only in LOI's if dhoni vacates the spot. we shouldn't think of him for tests unless he shows marked improvement in keeping standards.
__________________
Anything can be sacrificed for truth,
nothing is too valuable to sacrifice truth instead.
-- Swami Vivekananda
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old January 23, 2017, 11:35 AM
iDumb iDumb is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: June 18, 2010
Location: NYC
Favorite Player: Di Caprio
Posts: 7,244

No RIYAD IN TEST and I am happy.
__________________
Life is short. Have an affair.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old January 23, 2017, 11:48 AM
Roy_1 Roy_1 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 21, 2017
Location: India
Favorite Player: Kohli
Posts: 2,783

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here
the caveat being, not everyone anyone can be dhoni. he was a once in a lifetime player. and mark my words, India would miss his keeping skills even more than it misses his batting skills, unless we get a good enough alternative.

I am OK with going for a so-so WK for LOI's but not for tests. dismissals mean hell of a lot more in tests than in LOI's. one missed chance can really hurt you. it can be the difference between winning a test and losing it.
I still remember parthiv preventing a match & series win against australia in sydney with his horrible keeping. more than a decade later his keeping is still awful, as we saw in the england series.

however good the batting may be, test WK position should not come at the expense of keeping abilities.

btw, did you watch today's irani trophy match ? absolute gun performance from wriddhiman saha in 4th innings after ROI were 63/4.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/irani-cu...h/1053705.html
he has done that time and again, he saved our skin in WI too ! he is also an above avg keeper. he deserves a place in the side for sometime.

right now pant should play only in LOI's if dhoni vacates the spot. we shouldn't think of him for tests unless he shows marked improvement in keeping standards.
Agree with you on most parts, however I still think we don't have to be so puritan against Bangladesh, we could certainly field an A team with Pant being WK, just to give him and some others a taste of international cricket, also we do need a good back up WK considering perthiv is an absolute garbage. If BCCI was serious about this test, I am sure it would not be limited to only one, so I am pretty sure large scale experiments are going to take place during team selection and won't be surprised to see half a dozen new faces.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old January 23, 2017, 11:55 AM
Roy_1 Roy_1 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 21, 2017
Location: India
Favorite Player: Kohli
Posts: 2,783

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafi
Mahmudullah dropped everywhere. I still have faith. And i dont think indian super trundlers, yadav and shami will be threatening to him on an indian pitch.
I am pretty sure our "Super Trundlers" will comfortably outbowl your bowling wonders irrespective of the pitch given, you don't have to believe me now, I will quote you back when it happens.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old January 23, 2017, 01:31 PM
tiger1000's Avatar
tiger1000 tiger1000 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here
I keep hearing Riyad should be dropped but is there any alternative player who picks himself on performance alone ? any stand out ?
as they say class is permanent, form is not. this guy definitely has the ability.

@Nafi, the "super trundlers" average in the mid to high 140 k's and comfortably outbowled the vaunted english pace attack composed of broad, anderson et al on placid Indian pitches.
Class is permanent, form is temporary

Sucks for Ullah he doesn't have class nor does he have form...

What ability has he shown you in test cricket in a decade of playing test cricket, he has 1 hundred, averages 30

Others...

Nasir, Nurul, anamul, mossadek

I'd go Nurul

Tamim
Imrul
Mominul
Mushfiq
Shakib
Sabbir
Nurul
Shahid
Mehedi
Taskin/Taijul
Mustafizur/Taijul
__________________
Always forgive your enemies, nothing annoys them so much- Oscar Wilde.


Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old January 23, 2017, 03:11 PM
Tiger444's Avatar
Tiger444 Tiger444 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 8,793

1. Tamim
2. Imrul
3. Mominul
4. Mushy (C)
5. Shakib
6. Shabbir
7. Nurul (WK)
8. Miraz
9. Kamrul
10. Taskin
11. Roy

Subs
12. Mosaddek
13. Soumya
14. Taijul
15. Jayed
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old January 23, 2017, 03:54 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here
I keep hearing Riyad should be dropped but is there any alternative player who picks himself on performance alone ? any stand out ?
as they say class is permanent, form is not. this guy definitely has the ability.

@Nafi, the "super trundlers" average in the mid to high 140 k's and comfortably outbowled the vaunted english pace attack composed of broad, anderson et al on placid Indian pitches.
I'd say guys like mosaddek (averaging over 70) and liton (average just under 50) are worth giving opportunities to...there are a few that have the ability, riyad isn't the only one and the others are younger.
__________________
All Time Test XI: 1 Hobbs 2 B.Richards 3 Bradman 4 Kohli 5 V.Richards 6 Sobers 7 Gilchrist 8 Miller 9 Procter 10 Marshall 11 Warne
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old January 23, 2017, 04:36 PM
Ishmumislam Ishmumislam is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: February 25, 2013
Posts: 395

back and across technique of mosaddek is confused for weakness by management and some fans.. same happened with steve waugh and smith.. anamul has no future as tests top order so might aswell put him under 3 month keeper drill and see how good he can be
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old January 23, 2017, 05:18 PM
Match Adda's Avatar
Match Adda Match Adda is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 30, 2016
Location: U.S.A
Favorite Player: tamim, Sabbir, Mustafiz
Posts: 6,213

My X11
Tamim
somaya
Kaye's
mominul
Musfiq
Sabbir
Sakib
Miraz
Taskin
Rabbi
Mustafiz
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old January 23, 2017, 05:45 PM
Roy_1 Roy_1 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 21, 2017
Location: India
Favorite Player: Kohli
Posts: 2,783

I would love to see Soumya performing well against us with India wining comfortably of course

His lazy elegance and eye pleasing drives reminds me of Dada, has higher ceiling than most current Bangladeshi batsmen, will struggle against Ashwin though due to not having enough footwork atm
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:01 PM
Rifat's Avatar
Rifat Rifat is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Abu Jayed Rahi
Posts: 15,523

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy_1
I would love to see Soumya performing well against us with India wining comfortably of course

His lazy elegance and eye pleasing drives reminds me of Dada, has higher ceiling than most current Bangladeshi batsmen, will struggle against Ashwin though due to not having enough footwork atm
u hear that Zeeshan? me comparing Soumya with Ganguly has nothing to do with his ethnic background ...
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:04 PM
Rifat's Avatar
Rifat Rifat is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Abu Jayed Rahi
Posts: 15,523

my revised XI:

1) Tamim
2) Imrul
3) Mominul
4) Mushfiq
5) Soumya
6) Shakib
7) Sabbir
8) Miraz
9) Taijul
10) Kamrul
11) Mustafizur Rahman

12th man) Nasir Hossain
Reply With Quote
  #71  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:18 PM
NoName's Avatar
NoName NoName is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Sauga
Posts: 10,326

^ I like that team
__________________
"How the little piglets would grunt if they knew how the old boar suffered."
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:28 PM
Nafi's Avatar
Nafi Nafi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 23, 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mahmudullah Riyad
Posts: 6,190

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here

@Nafi, the "super trundlers" average in the mid to high 140 k's and comfortably outbowled the vaunted english pace attack composed of broad, anderson et al on placid Indian pitches.
Yeh theyre roided up? Whats your point.
__________________
BD_Shardul: ''I myself will not go through the troubles of dating. I will offer a prayer that will let me know if my would be bride is compatible with me through a dream''
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:32 PM
tiger1000's Avatar
tiger1000 tiger1000 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rifat
my revised XI:

1) Tamim
2) Imrul
3) Mominul
4) Mushfiq
5) Soumya
6) Shakib
7) Sabbir
8) Miraz
9) Taijul
10) Kamrul
11) Mustafizur Rahman

12th man) Nasir Hossain
Good team, but no taskin?

Was our best fast bowler... Last match
__________________
Always forgive your enemies, nothing annoys them so much- Oscar Wilde.


Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:52 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here

@Nafi, the "super trundlers" average in the mid to high 140 k's and comfortably outbowled the vaunted english pace attack composed of broad, anderson et al on placid Indian pitches.
Not even Shoaib or Lee "averaged" high 140s. In an over, yes, but even in a 4 over spell, I highly doubt Shoaib/Lee could maintain an average speed of "high 140s". Defining high 140s as 147+ (91.3 mph) I think only Yadav hit that mark and maybe a few times.

Regardless, that is still very quick in subcontinent conditions.

Interestingly, during the IPL, Mustafiz who isn't noted for his pace clocked a delivery at 144 kph (meaning it must have been at least 143.5).
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old January 23, 2017, 06:56 PM
al Furqaan's Avatar
al Furqaan al Furqaan is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918

My 14 man squad would be:

Tamim
Imrul
Mominul
Mushfiq
Shakib
Sabbir
Nurul (WK)
Miraz
Taijul/Shahid depending on pitch
Taskin
Mustafiz

Nasir
Mosaddek as bench
__________________
Bangladesh: Our Dream, Our Joy, Our Team

#OneTeam1Dream
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket