The Pace of Taskin & Rubel in New Zealand - Page 5

al Furqaan · #**101** January 18, 2017, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Night_wolf
predicted tashkin might be another useless bowler as rubel in test.

no comments as this is only one match. lets see what he delivers after 10

Produced 4 chances for 179 runs. Average of 45. Not bad for a debutant.

On a flat track.

Overseas.

Against all top order batsmen.

Yes, he may be Shahadat after 10 Tests, but he was certainly better than no ball Rubel and no pace Shahadat.

His 34th over (135 avg pace) was faster than his first over (130).

Facts dont agree with all narratives.

SportingBD · #**102** January 19, 2017, 02:12 PM

seems like both RUbel and Taskin will play today.

al Furqaan · #**103** January 19, 2017, 05:27 PM

Roy was the least threatening of the 3 pacers to play the last Test, plus had issues with his follow through. But Rubel in a Test? WTF.

Where is Mustafiz?

Rifat · #**104** January 19, 2017, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Roy was the least threatening of the 3 pacers to play the last Test, plus had issues with his follow through. But Rubel in a Test? WTF.

Where is Mustafiz?

This is Rubel's best chance to make an impact. He has been solid recently anyways.

tanvir_nus · #**105** January 19, 2017, 05:35 PM

I actually like this squad. For the second time I don't have any complains, one was the T20 series, I thought we went with the best squad and this test match.

hoodlum · #**106** January 19, 2017, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Roy was the least threatening of the 3 pacers to play the last Test, plus had issues with his follow through. But Rubel in a Test? WTF.

Where is Mustafiz?

injured and not fully fit.

tiger1000 · #**107** January 22, 2017, 06:04 PM

145.9 taskin

al Furqaan · #**108** January 25, 2017, 01:12 PM

What was Rubel's fastest? I saw 143.

Fizz quickest was 135.

Roy 142

Rabbi 140

SportingBD · #**109** January 25, 2017, 04:23 PM

^ wasn't too impressed with the pace... I think rubels highest was 143 also..

Rubel and Taskin have lot do learn about test cricket, I just think they should stay away.

Focus on ODI and T20.

tiger1000 · #**110** January 25, 2017, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportingBD
^ wasn't too impressed with the pace... I think rubels highest was 143 also..

Rubel and Taskin have lot do learn about test cricket, I just think they should stay away.

Focus on ODI and T20.

Did you watch the second test....

SportingBD · #**111** January 25, 2017, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiger1000
Did you watch the second test....

Nah, only for couple of hours..

but saw Taskin pace was 140+ consistently on that match..

Rubel also did the same..

no one broke 146 kph mark lol.. not even 145...

in general, I don't think they are test players, especially Rubel.

SportingBD · #**112** January 25, 2017, 05:06 PM

Taskin's new to this format, willing to see how he does..

but Rubel tried and tested already, wrong format for him.

NoName · #**113** January 25, 2017, 05:22 PM

Hopefully this is the last we see of Rubel in whites. During the plunder in the first test people were missing Rubel and thought he would have made a difference, but the results showed itself in the second test which was more bowler friendly! Imagine how bad his figures would have been in the first test lol

tiger1000 · #**114** January 25, 2017, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportingBD
Nah, only for couple of hours..

but saw Taskin pace was 140+ consistently on that match..

Rubel also did the same..

no one broke 146 kph mark lol.. not even 145...

in general, I don't think they are test players, especially Rubel.

Rubel not a test player

Taskin hit 145.9

And speed means little

Taskin created chance after chance, it was a world class performance by him

He was seaming it both ways on a good line and length at over 140, for over 20 overs, that's great quality in every sense of the word

Vepu · #**115** January 25, 2017, 07:02 PM

Taskin was indeed awesome in 2nd test. Only if we held onto our catches

cricman · #**116** January 25, 2017, 09:34 PM

The movement on this this pitch is very similar to that from his ODI debut

He might be a handful in South Africa and England.

Just has to build his stamina up, develop a good bouncer (Really Important!) & maybe be a little more deceptive with his run up.

al Furqaan · #**117** January 25, 2017, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportingBD
Nah, only for couple of hours..

but saw Taskin pace was 140+ consistently on that match..

Rubel also did the same..

no one broke 146 kph mark lol.. not even 145...

in general, I don't think they are test players, especially Rubel.

Check the Taskin wickets thread...theres a pic of him reaching 146.

NoName · #**118** January 25, 2017, 10:28 PM

Physique wise Taskin did pretty well this series, didn't seem to get tired or burned out.

Mas_UK25 · #**119** January 26, 2017, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoName
Physique wise Taskin did pretty well this series, didn't seem to get tired or burned out.

Bet it surprised those who thought he would burn out, and what not.

Big strapping lad like that needs more work (paying test matches), I say. His body will develop more he plays.

al Furqaan · #**120** January 26, 2017, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mas_UK25
Bet it surprised those who thought he would burn out, and what not.

Big strapping lad like that needs more work (paying test matches), I say. His body will develop more he plays.

Thats based on BC logic. All the old guns who used to post here have retired. Now apart from 2 guys off the top of my head, there is hardly any poster who has any idea of what competitive sports require or what talent is or how it needs to be nurured. Else you wouldn't threads every other tour to "drop Tamim" and "bring back the guy who I wanted dropped 6 months ago."

Now I've made my share of incorrect calls (not backing Shahid in 2015 and Mominul in 2012) but thats about it as far a I remember.

SportingBD · #**121** January 26, 2017, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Thats based on BC logic. All the old guns who used to post here have retired. Now apart from 2 guys off the top of my head, there is hardly any poster who has any idea of what competitive sports require or what talent is or how it needs to be nurured. Else you wouldn't threads every other tour to "drop Tamim" and "bring back the guy who I wanted dropped 6 months ago."

Now I've made my share of incorrect calls (not backing Shahid in 2015 and Mominul in 2012) but thats about it as far a I remember.

I have noted your post. Lets see how much idea you have...

You made a call on Taskin, lets see how it goes

tiger1000 · #**122** January 26, 2017, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Thats based on BC logic. All the old guns who used to post here have retired. Now apart from 2 guys off the top of my head, there is hardly any poster who has any idea of what competitive sports require or what talent is or how it needs to be nurured. Else you wouldn't threads every other tour to "drop Tamim" and "bring back the guy who I wanted dropped 6 months ago."

Now I've made my share of incorrect calls (not backing Shahid in 2015 and Mominul in 2012) but thats about it as far a I remember.

Mominul... That's a bad call

I counted Rabbi out... Better than i thought, but he might not improve much...

But I do agree with these drop this and that thread based on one series

Mahmadullah needs to be dropped though

mufi_02 · #**123** January 26, 2017, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Thats based on BC logic. All the old guns who used to post here have retired. Now apart from 2 guys off the top of my head, there is hardly any poster who has any idea of what competitive sports require or what talent is or how it needs to be nurured. Else you wouldn't threads every other tour to "drop Tamim" and "bring back the guy who I wanted dropped 6 months ago."

Now I've made my share of incorrect calls (not backing Shahid in 2015 and Mominul in 2012) but thats about it as far a I remember.

and Anamul. You had a signature for a long time that Anamul will be the first player to avg 50+ in Tests. something like that.

tiger1000 · #**124** January 26, 2017, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mufi_02
and Anamul. You had a signature for a long time that Anamul will be the first player to avg 50+ in Tests. something like that.

Anamul has got talent.

Don't know why people count him out

50+ talent, but he can average 40 odd if he fulfills his talent

He might have attitude problems though