|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
February 10, 2017, 01:55 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,771
|
|
No.
Liton Das is not a Test material. He needs to sort out his off side game before he can be considered for the Test side.
Nurul is a better choice.
|
February 10, 2017, 02:05 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 23, 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4,611
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
No.
Liton Das is not a Test material. He needs to sort out his off side game before he can be considered for the Test side.
Nurul is a better choice.
|
What, if any form suits him is its tests, in odis he's forced play more balls, in tests he can leave outside off and wait for straighter balls
Either way he's better with gloves than mushfiq and better bat than Ullah
Don't mind Nurul either though
__________________
Always forgive your enemies, nothing annoys them so much- Oscar Wilde.
|
February 10, 2017, 03:35 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: December 12, 2005
Location: Surrey
Favorite Player: Tamim and Shakib
Posts: 14,724
|
|
Even Kayes was a better wicket keeper than Mushfiqur. Although it later resulted iin cramp ☺
|
February 10, 2017, 04:20 PM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: August 2, 2011
Location: NY
Favorite Player: Lara, Shakib
Posts: 8,002
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
No.
Liton Das is not a Test material. He needs to sort out his off side game before he can be considered for the Test side.
Nurul is a better choice.
|
that's good. he will never get out in the slip cordon and will almost never edge it to the keeper. so pretty safe choice
__________________
Bangladesh
|
February 10, 2017, 04:30 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: September 5, 2009
Location: Guyana,South America
Favorite Player: Rahkeem Cornwall
Posts: 28,860
|
|
So when Liton fails with the gloves, someone else's name will be lifted up as the chosen one...
Then he'll fail...and the game of musical chairs will continue.
Chose the right guy.
|
February 10, 2017, 05:13 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: March 12, 2014
Posts: 3,604
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
No.
Liton Das is not a Test material. He needs to sort out his off side game before he can be considered for the Test side.
Nurul is a better choice.
|
Disagree. Liton is tailor made for test. He ll shine in test definitely. Hehasthe mind set to play big innings. Wicket keeping is better than mushi.
__________________
Love is blind..& I love team Bangladesh!
|
February 10, 2017, 05:32 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: June 27, 2007
Location: Dhaka Mental Hospital
Favorite Player: Jahanara Alam, Zuccarello
Posts: 25,243
|
|
Not the used old pair of gloves, guys...new pair of gloves chai, notun gloves...
Otherwise,
a. they won't fit, too small...b. tel tele ghaamer khub baajey ekta gondho thakbey...
__________________
God bless Ingrid Newkirk, Dianne Feinstein, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren & Mitch Landrieu!
twitter.com/bujheekom
|
February 11, 2017, 02:46 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 25,325
|
|
how good is Liton as a WK ? don't tell me he is better than Mushy because anyone is better than Mushy.
Nurul recently scored a hundred in BCL, right? scored some useful runs against NZ.
Nannu said Nurul is better WK than Liton.
I understand Liton is most probably a better batsman than Nurul but what we can not afford is another not so good WK at the expense of getting a better batsman keeper.
Personally I won't mind an excellent wicket keeper who can score some 30s or 40s specially looking at the state of our fielding.
__________________
সবাই সুখে সুখী হলে বলো তবে হবে কে ভবঘুরে
|
February 11, 2017, 06:03 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by simon
how good is Liton as a WK ? don't tell me he is better than Mushy because anyone is better than Mushy.
Nurul recently scored a hundred in BCL, right? scored some useful runs against NZ.
Nannu said Nurul is better WK than Liton.
I understand Liton is most probably a better batsman than Nurul but what we can not afford is another not so good WK at the expense of getting a better batsman keeper.
Personally I won't mind an excellent wicket keeper who can score some 30s or 40s specially looking at the state of our fielding.
|
Based on what I have seen (as a fan, not an expert) : Just purely based on wicket-keeping (excluding batting):
Nurul is better than Litton.
Litton is better than Rahim or Anamul.
Personally I am ok with either Nurul or Litton as bother are young and both are decent WK. I have reservation about Anamul as a specialized (and long term) WK.
__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
|
February 11, 2017, 09:18 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: April 30, 2013
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Favorite Player: Sangakkara, Mike Hussey
Posts: 7,970
|
|
Anamul kept wickets in BPL and was quite good. He has good height too and very agile. Not a bad choice for a keeper.
|
February 12, 2017, 06:58 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 2, 2016
Posts: 411
|
|
From what I saw this test match - Mushfiq should not be keeping in tests. Simple. Whoever else is worthy of a being BD test keeper should be in. Drop one of Riyad or Sabbir. This is not complicated.
Only way he still keeps wicket, is if he's ready to bat #4. And even that is not ideal IMO, but if they feel that it strengthens the team, by adding a Riyad/Sabbit to the batting unit as opposed to some 'keeper, that's fine. But BD needs him to bad at #4. This is stupid logic, and is costing the BD lineup balance and not a few runs.
|
February 12, 2017, 07:39 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 32,799
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndYeah
From what I saw this test match - Mushfiq should not be keeping in tests. Simple. Whoever else is worthy of a being BD test keeper should be in. Drop one of Riyad or Sabbir. This is not complicated.
Only way he still keeps wicket, is if he's ready to bat #4. And even that is not ideal IMO, but if they feel that it strengthens the team, by adding a Riyad/Sabbit to the batting unit as opposed to some 'keeper, that's fine. But BD needs him to bad at #4. This is stupid logic, and is costing the BD lineup balance and not a few runs.
|
Mushfiq is the captain. His wife's sister's husband is Riyad. You do the math.
+++
We lost 14 of 15 while he was the captain in ODIs. They Mash took over, the team dynamics changed and we started winning the close ones. We were actually fielding 11 players instead of customary 9. We don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure out what needs to be done. Coach almost did that before the England series. However, senior players like Shakib and Mash blocked that initiative. That is the inside story.
We have very good keeper-batsman waiting in the wings. They can't get in to the 11 because of politics. Both Liton and Anamul has much higher prospect than 33 average players.
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.
|
February 12, 2017, 09:10 AM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: August 2, 2011
Location: NY
Favorite Player: Lara, Shakib
Posts: 8,002
|
|
Cmon TE bhai! Do you really think Riyad is in the team because of nepotism?
|
February 12, 2017, 10:33 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: March 9, 2008
Location: Ω
Posts: 35,911
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bujhee kom
Not the used old pair of gloves, guys...new pair of gloves chai, notun gloves...
Otherwise,
a. they won't fit, too small...b. tel tele ghaamer khub baajey ekta gondho thakbey...
|
Exactly my sentiments! Beat me to it...
|
February 12, 2017, 12:33 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: March 17, 2009
Favorite Player: Aravinda DeSilva, Lara
Posts: 3,084
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miraz
No.
Liton Das is not a Test material. He needs to sort out his off side game before he can be considered for the Test side.
Nurul is a better choice.
|
have you ever seen jack russel, the eng keeper from 90's bat ?
he could not play a ball on the off-side for the love of god, yet scored enough to justify his position in the era of alec stewart. got a 100 against us in the '96 series. the one ganguly and dravid debuted in.
__________________
Anything can be sacrificed for truth,
nothing is too valuable to sacrifice truth instead.
-- Swami Vivekananda
|
February 12, 2017, 02:02 PM
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: February 10, 2017
Location: New York
Favorite Player: Sanga,Mash,Shakib,Fizz
Posts: 3,782
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mufi_02
Cmon TE bhai! Do you really think Riyad is in the team because of nepotism?
|
Yes he is! There is no other explanation. If we drop Mullah, Mushy will throw a hissy fit and possibly the other seniors will join him. Because they treat the national team like its adda marar jaiga.
|
February 12, 2017, 03:21 PM
|
|
BC Staff BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Favorite Player: Mohammad Rafique
Posts: 15,771
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neel Here
have you ever seen jack russel, the eng keeper from 90's bat ?
he could not play a ball on the off-side for the love of god, yet scored enough to justify his position in the era of alec stewart. got a 100 against us in the '96 series. the one ganguly and dravid debuted in.
|
Hi Neel, yes - I am old enough to see Jack Russel's batting. He knew his limitations and played around it. Liton is no Jack Russel. He looked fish out of water in his international appearances.
|
February 12, 2017, 03:43 PM
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: May 13, 2015
Posts: 193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mufi_02
Cmon TE bhai! Do you really think Riyad is in the team because of nepotism?
|
Of course he is It should be painfully obvious at this point
|
February 13, 2017, 03:12 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: December 25, 2012
Location: Savar
Favorite Player: Anybody who plays for BD
Posts: 3,357
|
|
http://m.prothom-alo.com/sports/arti...ললেন
Here we go. Mushy doesnt wanna give up gloves
|
February 13, 2017, 03:15 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: February 20, 2008
Favorite Player: Tam,Sak,Nasa,Mash
Posts: 25,325
|
|
Decision should be made by the board and mushy will hv to oblige.
__________________
সবাই সুখে সুখী হলে বলো তবে হবে কে ভবঘুরে
|
February 13, 2017, 05:36 PM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Sauga
Posts: 10,326
|
|
Lol lets see if BCB has the spine to do it
__________________
"How the little piglets would grunt if they knew how the old boar suffered."
|
February 13, 2017, 06:52 PM
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273
|
|
If we want the team to be better, we have to demand a higher standard, we have better keepers than mushy and he consistently makes mistakes, definitely time to remove the gloves from mushy.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.
|
|