Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadukor
We are obsessed with the need for extra pace. Even if you look at shafiul or rubel, they seriously lack penetration where as every time somebody like nazmul or mash plays they pick up wickets. Yet Nazmul doesn't get picked because he doesn't "look" threatening enough and Mash gets written off because he lost a bit of pace.
|
I agree with this.
But I have to say Jamie must shoulder some criticism on this one. He didn't play Syed Rasel or Nazmul because they "lacked pace" to be effective. Whilst I was there he also said that no one outside of the squad of 16 he assembled when I arrived was worth looking at.
If this sort of feeling permeates down from the top, then those underneath and in the board room are going to start believing such nonsense. It is thus no wonder that players, who can do a swing or seam bowling job for Bangladesh, get discarded and overlooked.
Although I coach speed into bowlers, speed isn't the meal ticket into any international side unless it comes with some sort of control. I recall Shaun Tait for example, bowling 150 kph plus for county side Durham one season in England, and getting smashed to all parts of the ground because his control was so poor. The same happened to a young, 19 year-old Dale Steyn at Essex before he had corrective coaching. In Richard Hadlee's book, he himself said much the same thing about trying to bowl fast without control and getting smoked.
There is no problem with being quick or being medium pace. the problem comes when you are not accurate and give easy hits away.
After the Asia Cup, I think everyone now understands how important that is.