View Single Post
  #6  
Old August 4, 2019, 02:30 AM
ToBeFair's Avatar
ToBeFair ToBeFair is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 8, 2018
Posts: 2,706

Now lets do a similar analysis of Rohit Sharma's performance

v South Africa 122* runs @ 84.72
Absolutely dominating performance, without it, India might have lost.
Score 10/10

v Australia 57 runs @ 81.42
This opening half century was crucial to see off the testing opening spell and set the platform for a winning total.
Score 9/10

v Pakistan 140 runs @ 123.89
Absolute domination, broke the opponent psychologically.
Score 10/10

v Afghanistan 1 runs @ 10
Fail
Score 0/10

v West Indies 18 runs @ 78.26
Fail
Score 3/10

v England 102 runs @ 93.57
Needed to have a better strike rate but it is easier said than done while batting second
Score 8/10

v Bangladesh 104 runs @ 113.04
Match winning knock, decimated BD mentally
Score 10/10

v Sri Lanka 103 runs @ 109.57
Absolute domination
Score 10/10

v New Zealand 1 runs @ 25
Fail
0/10

Conclusion: He is a binary mode player, but he did the job more often than not, stumped his authority in single handedly taking the match away from opposition and eviscerating them psychologically.

Average 6.67

This is also a fair reflection. Rohit Sharma is definitely more likely to be able to swing match outcome single handedly compared to Shakib. Therefore, Rohit was a better WC performer compared to Shak.
__________________
Self-respect is the fruit of discipline; the sense of dignity grows with the ability to say no to oneself- AJH| Don’t disrespect your life by living aimlessly – set goals and work hard to attain them.
Reply With Quote